Margaret Canovan on how the term populism was used, 1981 9.7 Late 20th- and early 21st-century growthĪlthough frequently used by historians, social scientists, and political commentators, the term is exceptionally vague and refers in different contexts to a bewildering variety of phenomena.In the 21st century, the struggle over the term intensified in political discourse, particularly in the Americas and Europe, with it being used to describe a range of left-wing, right-wing, and centrist groups that challenged the established parties. In the 1960s the term became increasingly popular among social scientists in Western countries, and later in the 20th century it was applied to various political parties active in liberal democracies. In popular discourse-where the term has often been used pejoratively-it has sometimes been used synonymously with demagogy, to describe politicians who present overly simplistic answers to complex questions in a highly emotional manner, or with opportunism, to characterise politicians who seek to please voters without rational consideration as to the best course of action. Some economists have used the term in reference to governments which engage in substantial public spending financed by foreign loans, resulting in hyperinflation and emergency measures. An approach associated with the political scientist Ernesto Laclau presents populism as an emancipatory social force through which marginalised groups challenge dominant power structures.

According to the popular agency definition used by some historians of United States history, populism refers to popular engagement of the population in political decision making. Other scholars of the social sciences have defined the term populism differently. Thus, populists can be found at different locations along the left–right political spectrum, and there exist both left-wing populism and right-wing populism. According to the ideational approach, populism is often combined with other ideologies, such as nationalism, liberalism, or socialism. Populist parties and social movements are often led by charismatic or dominant figures who present themselves as 'the voice of the people'. Populists typically present 'the elite' as comprising the political, economic, cultural, and media establishment, depicted as a homogeneous entity and accused of placing their own interests, and often the interests of other groups-such as large corporations, foreign countries, or immigrants-above the interests of 'the people'. Populists differ in how 'the people' are defined, but it can be based along class, ethnic, or national lines. Within political science and other social sciences, several different definitions of populism have been employed, with some scholars proposing that the term be rejected altogether.Ī common framework for interpreting populism is known as the ideational approach: this defines populism as an ideology which presents 'the people' as a morally good force and contrasts them against 'the elite', who are portrayed as corrupt and self-serving.

The term developed in the late 19th century and has been applied to various politicians, parties and movements since that time, often as a pejorative.

It is frequently associated with anti-establishment and anti-political sentiment. Populism refers to a range of political stances that emphasize the idea of 'the people' and often juxtapose this group against ' the elite'.

Powerblock pro vs elite